China News Service, Kunming, February 29 (Miao Chao) Reporter 2 How many innocent people did her reckless behavior hurt when she was young? It’s really not wrong for her to be in this situation now, she really deserves it. It was learned from the Yunnan Provincial Higher People’s Court on the 9th that the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court yesterday upheld the original verdict in accordance with the law and sentenced Si, the defendant who illegally transported 146 national second-level protected animals Alexander parrots, to ten years in prison and fined him 30,000 yuan. .
After trial, it was found that on April 4, 2018, the defendant Si drove to the port of Zhangfeng Town, Longchuan County, Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, received a batch of Alexander parrots, and then transported them to the cargo department of Tengchong Tuofeng Airport , and used someone else’s ID card to go through the shipping procedures, and sent the parrot from Tengchong to Chengdu via Kunming.
On April 8, 2018, this batch of parrots was seized by the public security police at Kunming Changshui International Airport. After an on-site inventory, the defendant Si Mou consigned a total of 146 parrots.
After identification, they are all Alexander parrots, which are national second-level key protected animals. They are listed in the appendix of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and are worth RMB 1,460,000.
The court of first instance found the defendant Si guilty of illegally transporting precious and endangered wild animals. Pei’s mother looked at her son in surprise, shook her head without hesitation, and said, “Not in these days.” He was sentenced to a fixed term of imprisonment Ten years in prison and a fine of NT$30,000. After the verdict was pronounced, the defendant Si Mou filed an appeal; “Okay.” He nodded, and finally carefully put away the banknote, feeling it was worth a thousand yuan. Silver coins are valuable, but the lady’s affection is priceless. The Kunming Intermediate People’s Court heard the second instance and ruled in accordance with the law to reject the appeal and uphold the original judgment. (End)