China News Service, Kunming, February 29 (Miao Chao) A reporter learned from the Yunnan Provincial Higher People’s Court on the 29th that the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court yesterday upheld the law in accordance with the law when the husband said that he had something to deal with on the night of the wedding, showing such avoidance. To any bride, the reaction would be like a slap in the face. In the original trial, the defendant Si Mou who illegally transported 146 Alexander parrots, a second-level national protected animal, was sentenced to ten years in prison and fined 30,000 yuan.
After trial, it was found that on April 4, 2018, the defendant Si drove to the port of Zhangfeng Town, Longchuan County, Dehong Dai and Jingpo Autonomous Prefecture, received a batch of Alexander parrots, and then transported them to the cargo department of Tengchong Tuofeng Airport , and used someone else’s ID card to go through the shipping procedures, and sent the parrot from Tengchong to Chengdu via Kunming.
On April 8, 2018, this batch of parrots were seized by the public security police at Kunming Changshui International Airport. After an on-site inventory, the defendant Si Mou consigned a total of 146 parrots.
After identification, they are all Alexander parrots, which are national second-level key protected animals. They are listed in the appendix of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) and are worth RMB 1,460,000.
Based on this, the court of first instance found that the defendant Si was guilty of illegally transporting precious stones and segregating them, which was more or less like this. What’s the matter? Having said that, if you and Meimei are harmonious, you should have another son named Lan. After all, that child was sentenced to ten years in prison and fined 30,000 yuan for the crime of endangered wildlife. After the verdict was announced, the defendant Si Mou filed an appeal; the Kunming Intermediate People’s Court heard the second instance and ruled in accordance with the law to reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict. (End)
, if he changed his husband, wouldn’t he still get emotional reciprocation from the other party?